Skip to main content

Comparative RNA-Seq is not enough to reveal the evolution of regeneration

NEWS - How can lizards regrow their tails, salamanders regrow their arms and legs, and planarian worms even regrow their entire heads? Why don’t humans have the ability to regenerate lost body parts?

Comparative RNA-Seq is not enough to reveal the evolution of regeneration

The evolution of regeneration is an ancient trait shared by our ancestors, but why have many species lost the ability over time? Did the evolution of regeneration evolve independently in different species?

Researchers from the University of California at Davis and the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena investigated the genomes of axolotls, zebrafish, sea anemones, sea sponges, and sea cucumbers, all of which have the ability to regenerate, but have evolved differently.

They used RNA-seq techniques to analyze datasets to capture snapshots of gene expression in regenerating tissue samples. However, they found that these snapshots were not enough to determine whether there were shared genes for regeneration. The genes that were detected were used for basic cellular processes such as cell division.

Each species uses a different combination of Wnt genes, and it is impossible to determine a shared set of Wnt genes to indicate a shared ancestor in regeneration. This research highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the complex developmental processes that underlie regeneration.

"RNA-seq is not good enough to identify processes that are conserved between distantly related things. Regeneration may be a process at another level, such as the cellular level, rather than the genetic level," says David Gold of the University of California, Davis.

The researchers suggest that the study of developmental biology is needed to truly understand the ancient evolutionary processes of each organism. The molecular history inherited from ancestors can help understand the mechanisms of biological regeneration, not just gene expression in species that exist today.

Original research

Noémie C Sierra, Noah Olsman, Lynn Yi, Lior Pachter, Lea Goentoro, David A Gold, A Novel Approach to Comparative RNA-Seq Does Not Support a Conserved Set of Orthologs Underlying Animal Regeneration, Genome Biology and Evolution, Volume 16, Issue 6, June 2024, DOI:10.1093/gbe/evae120

Popular Posts

Javan broadhead planarian (Bipalium javanum)

Cacing palu or Javan broadhead planarian ( Bipalium javanum ) is a species of animal in Geoplanidae, hermaphrodite, living on the ground, predators, often called only hammerhead or broadhead or shovel worms because of wide heads and simple copulatory organs. B. javanum has a slim stature, up to 20 cm long, up to 0.5 cm wide, head wide up to 1 cm or less, small neck, widening in the middle and the back end is rounded, all black and shiny. Javan broadhead planarians walk above ground level by raising their heads and actively looking left, right and looking up using strong neck muscles. Move swiftly, track meander, climb to get through all obstacles or make a new path if the obstacle is too high. Cacing palu track and prey on earthworms and mollusks. They use muscles and sticky secretions to attach themselves to prey to lock in. The head and ends of the body are wrapped around and continue to close the body to stop prey reactions. They produce tetrodotoxins which are very strong...

Thomas Sutikna lives with Homo floresiensis

BLOG - On October 28, 2004, a paper was published in Nature describing the dwarf hominin we know today as Homo floresiensis that has shocked the world. The report changed the geographical landscape of early humans that previously stated that the Pleistocene Asia was only represented by two species, Homo erectus and Homo sapiens . The report titled "A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia" written by Peter Brown and Mike J. Morwood from the University of New England with Thomas Sutikna, Raden Pandji Soejono, Jatmiko, E. Wahyu Saptomo and Rokus Awe Due from the National Archaeology Research Institute (ARKENAS), Indonesia, presents more diversity in the genus Homo. “Immediately, my fever vanished. I couldn’t sleep well that night. I couldn’t wait for sunrise. In the early morning we went to the site, and when we arrived in the cave, I didn’t say a thing because both my mind and heart couldn’t handle this incredible moment. I just went down...

Swietenia mahagoni and Swietenia macrophylla, the differences

SPECIES HEAD TO HEAD - To date, mahogany ( Swietenia Jacq.) is recorded as having four species: West Indian mahogany or small-leaved mahogany ( Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq.), big-leaf mahogany ( Swietenia macrophylla King), Honduran mahogany ( Swietenia humilis Zucc.) and Swietenia × aubrevilleana Stehlé & Cusin. The debate over the number of taxa in the genus is still not resolved. Some researchers believe that there are only two species: S. mahagoni and S. macrophylla . I agree with that opinion and the two species can only be differentiated by the size of the leaves. All species in this genus have similar morphology except for leaf size. The following is the key to identifying these two species. S. mahagoni has a stalk length of around 37 cm with 5-6 pairs of strands. The strands are about 10 cm long and about 3.5 cm wide. S. macrophylla has a stalk length of up to 45 cm with 4-5 pairs of strands. The strands are up to 31 cm long and up to 8 cm wide. By Aryo Bando...